Visit UKSCAll cases
812 Cases
JCPC/2025/0051
•
EXTRADITION
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 13 June 2025
JCPC/2025/0006
•
TORT
Appeal issuedCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal wrong to uphold the decision of the General Legal Council, finding Mr Foote guilty of professional negligence and ordering him to pay restitution to his former client?
Last updated: 13 June 2025
JCPC/2025/0009
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Permission to Appeal refusedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err in deciding that the appellant was not entitled to rest on the advances received from her late husband’s moveable estate while he was alive, to the extent that the advances exceeded the disposable one-third of his moveable estate?
Last updated: 13 June 2025
JCPC/2025/0011
•
CRIME
Permission to Appeal refusedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err by failing to find: (1) that the fresh evidence disclosed by the police and/or obtained since the trial establishes a miscarriage of justice. (2) That the appearance of jury bias amounts to a material irregularity in the proceedings and gives rise to a real possibility of bias that renders Mr Allen’s conviction unsafe. (3) The prosecution failed to disclose documents that undermined the police case and assisted the Defence case, such that there was a miscarriage of justice.
Last updated: 13 June 2025
JCPC/2025/0012
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err by: (1) Failing to give effect to a later contract, known as the “2014 agreement”, which allegedly remained a valid agreement. (2) Conducting an enquiry into sums paid under an earlier agreement, known as the “2007 agreement”, rather than acknowledging the 2014 superseded this agreement. (3) Failing to appreciate that section 11 of the Moneylenders Act was inapplicable to the 2014 agreement. (4) Failing to consider that, if the 2014 agreement was nevertheless non-compliant with section 11, then the Appellant was entitled to relief under the principles of unjust enrichment.
Last updated: 13 June 2025
JCPC/2023/0114
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal wrong to hold that (i) there was no binding agreement to pay an additional sum under the contract for services in the absence of approval by the Respondent’s board, and (ii) in the alternative, there was no consideration for a separate agreement to pay the additional sum?
Last updated: 11 June 2025
JCPC/2022/0062
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment givenCase summary:The validity under Antiguan law of a Rights Agreement adopted on 28 March 2016 by the board of the Respondent company without shareholder approval.
Linked casesLast updated: 11 June 2025
JCPC/2022/0041
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment givenCase summary:This case concerns the validity under Antiguan law of an AGM vote and a Rights Agreement. In particular, the Privy Council is asked to decide: 1. whether the incumbent board was validly removed and new board validly elected by shareholder votes at an AGM held on 6 February 2018; and 2. whether the Rights Agreement was validly adopted by the Company Board on 28 March 2016 as a matter of Antiguan law.
Linked casesLast updated: 11 June 2025
JCPC/2025/0050
•
Appeal issuedCase summary:Last updated: 10 June 2025
JCPC/2024/0012
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Judgment scheduledCase summary:Is the Appellant entitled to an order for possession of the disputed land on the basis that the Respondents are trespassers who have not acquired a possessory title by adverse possession?
Last updated: 10 June 2025
JCPC/2024/0053
•
ARBITRATION
WithdrawnCase summary:Whether arbitral award to be set aside for breach of natural justice.
Last updated: 4 June 2025
JCPC/2025/0047
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Appeal issuedCase summary:Last updated: 4 June 2025
JCPC/2025/0049
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 4 June 2025
JCPC/2025/0030
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err by breaching the Appellant’s fair trial rights, in failing to provide sufficient reasons and consideration to the Appellant’s submissions?
Last updated: 4 June 2025
JCPC/2025/0048
•
Appeal issuedCase summary:Last updated: 3 June 2025
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.