Visit UKSCAll cases
827 Cases
JCPC/2024/0020
•
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:Was the appellant eligible for the position of acting Deputy Chief Fire Officer prior to and/or after August 2019, and by failing to consider him for the post did the first and second respondents: (i) act irrationally, illegally and/or unfairly; (ii) breach Regulation 155 of the Public Service Commission Regulations; (iii) breach the appellant’s right to protection of the law under Section 4(b) of the Constitution, and consequently the appellant’s right to procedural protection under Section 5(2)(h) of the Constitution; and, (iv) breach a legitimate expectation that he would be considered?
Last updated: 15 July 2025
JCPC/2025/0066
•
COMMERCIAL
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 14 July 2025
JCPC/2024/0077
•
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:What (if any) is the scope of the joint interest privilege enjoyed by the shareholders and former shareholders of Jardine Strategic Holdings Limited (the “First Appellant”) over legal advice obtained by the First Appellant? Can a company assert privilege over its legal advice against a shareholder only where litigation privilege is established, or from the time that the interests of the company and shareholder became adverse?
Last updated: 14 July 2025
JCPC/2025/0065
•
NEGLIGENCE
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 14 July 2025
JCPC/2025/0014
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Did the courts below fail properly to consider all the evidence in: (1) granting a mortgagee an order for vacant possession over a defaulting mortgagor’s property; and (2) ordering the mortgagor to pay a sum into court before granting an extension of time for permission to appeal that vacant possession order?
Last updated: 11 July 2025
JCPC/2025/0064
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 11 July 2025
JCPC/2023/0114
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Judgment givenCase summary:Was the Court of Appeal wrong to hold that (i) there was no binding agreement to pay an additional sum under the contract for services in the absence of approval by the Respondent’s board, and (ii) in the alternative, there was no consideration for a separate agreement to pay the additional sum?
Last updated: 10 July 2025
JCPC/2025/0063
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 10 July 2025
JCPC/2023/0109
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:In what circumstances are Commissioners to a Commission of Enquiry required to give notice to individuals that it intends to criticise them in its report?
Last updated: 10 July 2025
JCPC/2025/0027
•
CRIME
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:(1) Whether, in substituting a sentence of two years’ imprisonment for a sentence of 3 years’ penal servitude, the Supreme Court of Mauritius: i) failed to give due consideration to the principles of proportionality and parity; and ii) breached the Appellant’s constitutional rights. (2) Whether the mandatory minimum sentence of penal servitude that a convicted person can be sentenced to under section 30(1)(f)(i) of the Dangerous Drugs Act, coupled with section 47(4), is unconstitutional.
Last updated: 10 July 2025
JCPC/2025/0053
•
INSOLVENCY
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Whether the Court of Appeal erred in finding that the Appellant did not have standing to pursue an appeal.
Last updated: 10 July 2025
JCPC/2025/0062
•
Appeal issuedCase summary:Last updated: 9 July 2025
JCPC/2023/0091
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Awaiting JudgmentCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err by disturbing the trial Judge’s share valuation methodology?
Last updated: 9 July 2025
JCPC/2024/1003
•
TAX
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 8 July 2025
JCPC/2024/1004
•
EMPLOYMENT
Appeal issuedCase summary:Did the Court of Appeal err in upholding the Industrial Court’s ruling that the Appellant is the successor to British West Indian Airways and therefore bound to recognise the Respondent as one of its recognised majority unions under the Industrial Relations Act?
Last updated: 8 July 2025
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.