
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
This is the final court of appeal for the UK overseas territories and Crown dependencies. It also serves those Commonwealth countries that have retained the appeal to His Majesty in Council or, in the case of republics, to the Judicial Committee.
The Court is closed for the remainder of the day
LISTINGS
Upcoming
- Avon Freeholds Limited (Respondent) v Cresta Court E RTM Company Limited (Appellant)
UK Supreme Court
Judgment
27 August 2026
Lord Reed,
Lord Briggs,
Lord Stephens,
Lady Rose,
Lord Snowden
Does the failure to serve a participation notice on a qualifying tenant invalidate a claim notice served by the right to manage company?
- Aeden Balwah (by Shelly-Ann Balwah, his Mother and Next Friend) (Appellant) v Surgi-Med Clinic Co. Limited and another (Respondents) No 2 (Trinidad & Tobago)
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Judgment
28 August 2026
Lord Lloyd-Jones,
Lord Leggatt,
Lord Stephens,
Lord Doherty,
Lady Wise
These appeals concern allegations of clinical negligence following Aeden’s birth. The issues raised for the JCPC’s consideration all concern findings of fact in relation to the cause of Aeden’s cerebral palsy. In Dr Abdulla’s appeal (JCPC/2025/0063), and in Surgi-Med Clinic Co Ltd’s cross-appeal (JCPC/2025/0065/A) (1) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to reverse the High Court’s finding of fact as to the timing of Dr Abdulla’s arrival? (2) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to find that causation was inevitably proved against Dr Abdulla, if it was proved that he arrived at 4am? In Aeden Balwah’s appeal (JCPC/2025/0065) (1) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to uphold the High Court’s finding that it had not been proved that Surgi-Med Clinic Co Ltd’s breach of duty caused Aeden Balwah’s cerebral palsy?
Linked cases
- Aeden Balwah (by Shelly-Ann Balwah, his Mother and Next Friend) (Respondent) v Surgi-Med Clinic Co. Limited (Appellant) (Trinidad and Tobago)
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Judgment
28 August 2026
Lord Lloyd-Jones,
Lord Leggatt,
Lord Stephens,
Lord Doherty,
Lady Wise
These appeals concern allegations of clinical negligence following Aeden’s birth. The issues raised for the JCPC’s consideration all concern findings of fact in relation to the cause of Aeden’s cerebral palsy. In Dr Abdulla’s appeal (JCPC/2025/0063), and in Surgi-Med Clinic Co Ltd’s cross-appeal (JCPC/2025/0065/A) (1) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to reverse the High Court’s finding of fact as to the timing of Dr Abdulla’s arrival? (2) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to find that causation was inevitably proved against Dr Abdulla, if it was proved that he arrived at 4am? In Aeden Balwah’s appeal (JCPC/2025/0065) (1) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to uphold the High Court’s finding that it had not been proved that Surgi-Med Clinic Co Ltd’s breach of duty caused Aeden Balwah’s cerebral palsy?
Linked cases
- Aeden Balwah (by Shelly-Ann Balwah, his mother and next friend) and another (Respondents) v Marwan Ahmad Alsayed Abdulla (Appellant) (Trinidad & Tobago)
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Judgment
28 August 2026
Lord Lloyd-Jones,
Lord Leggatt,
Lord Stephens,
Lord Doherty,
Lady Wise
These appeals concern allegations of clinical negligence following Aeden’s birth. The issues raised for the JCPC’s consideration all concern findings of fact in relation to the cause of Aeden’s cerebral palsy. In Dr Abdulla’s appeal (JCPC/2025/0063), and in Surgi-Med Clinic Co Ltd’s cross-appeal (JCPC/2025/0065/A) (1) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to reverse the High Court’s finding of fact as to the timing of Dr Abdulla’s arrival? (2) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to find that causation was inevitably proved against Dr Abdulla, if it was proved that he arrived at 4am? In Aeden Balwah’s appeal (JCPC/2025/0065) (1) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to uphold the High Court’s finding that it had not been proved that Surgi-Med Clinic Co Ltd’s breach of duty caused Aeden Balwah’s cerebral palsy?
Linked cases
- R (on the application of Ammori) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)
UK Supreme Court
Hearing
4 November 2026
Was the decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to proscribe Palestine Action under section 3 of the Terrorism Act 2000 lawful?
THINGS TO DO

Take a tour of the Court
We offer a range of tours to suit individuals and groups, including in-person and virtual tours.
Exhibitions and events
Find out what's on, including our permanent exhibition about the history and work of the Court.
NEWS

Permission to Appeal
•
24 August 2026
Permission to Appeal -July 2026
Permission to Appeal -July 2026

Future judgments
•
24 August 2026
Future Judgments
Future Judgments

Other
•
20 August 2026
New permanent exhibition The Law and Us opens at the UK Supreme Court
The Supreme Court is proud to announce that its new permanent exhibition is open to the public
SPEECHES
LATEST JUDGMENTS
20 August 2026
Paradise Island Lighthouse and Beach Club Company Limited (Appellant) v The Attorney General of the Commonwealth of The Bahamas (Respondent) (Bahamas)12 August 2026
Margot Serra and Ors (Appellants) v Attorney General for Gibraltar (Respondent)29 July 2026
Devendranath Hurnam (Appellant) v PV Veerabudren (Respondent) (Mauritius)11 June 2026
Unicomer (St Vincent) Ltd (Appellant) v Appeal Commissioners and another (Respondents) (St Vincent and the Grenadines)- Luc Guilliey (Appellant) v OCAPAC Mauritius Holding Ltd (Respondent) (Mauritius)



