Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

This is the final court of appeal for the UK overseas territories and Crown dependencies. It also serves those Commonwealth countries that have retained the appeal to His Majesty in Council or, in the case of republics, to the Judicial Committee.

Find a case

The Court is closed for the remainder of the day

QUICK LINKS

LISTINGS

Upcoming

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Hearing
19 March 2026
Manhattan Coffee Investment Holding (in liquidation) (Respondent) v Stephen Mbugua Mwagiru (Appellant) (Mauritius)
Lord Briggs,
Lord Leggatt,
Lady Rose,
Lord Richards,
Lord Doherty
Did the Court of Appeal err (1) by concluding that the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court of Mauritius had granted the Appellant leave under section 154(1)(c) of the Insolvency Act to continue the Plaint in the name and on behalf of the Respondent; and (2) by failing to treat the application as one to enable the Appellant to apply under the Court’s inherent jurisdiction and section 174(3)(a) of the Insolvency Act for leave to continue the Plaint as a derivative claim?
Linked cases
JCPC/2025/0044 Manhattan Coffee Investment Holding (in liquidation) (Respondent) v Stephen Mbugua Mwagiru (Appellant) (Mauritius) No 2
Related case
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Judgment
19 March 2026
A and 6 others (Appellants) v C and 13 others (Respondents)
Lord Reed,
Lord Briggs,
Lord Stephens,
Lady Rose,
Lord Richards
In exercising the Consent Powers, do the Protectors have the Wider Role or the Narrow Role?
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Hearing
24 March 2026
Richard Taylor Assistant Superintendent of Police (Respondent) v Natalie Natasha Spring and another (Appellants) (Trinidad and Tobago)
Lord Reed,
Lord Leggatt,
Lord Burrows,
Lord Stephens,
Lord Doherty
Did the Court of Appeal err in its interpretation of the Civil Asset Recovery and Management and Unexplained Wealth Act No.8 of 2019 (the “Act”) in finding that the Preliminary Unexplained Wealth Order (“PUWO”) originally imposed under that Act and then set aside by the High Court could be reinstated, including as against the Estate of Sheldon Spring?
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Hearing
26 March 2026
Anthony Noel Hosein (formerly Anthony Noel Egbert) (Appellant) v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago)
Lord Lloyd-Jones,
Lord Hamblen,
Lord Leggatt,
Lord Stephens,
Lady Rose
(i) Was the Court of Appeal wrong because it did not overturn the decision of the trial judge to strike out Mr Hosein’s constitutional claim on the basis of various factors, in particular the availability of a parallel remedy and the delay in bringing proceedings? (ii) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to conclude there was no evidence of apparent bias on the part of the trial judge?
UK Supreme Court
Hearing
20 May 2026
Forthwell Limited (Appellant) v Pontegadea UK Limited (Respondent)
Lord Reed,
Lord Stephens,
Lady Simler,
Lord Doherty,
Lord Hodge
In what circumstances can a party to a contract recover damages for a breach of that contract in respect of losses that were sustained not by the contracting party itself but by its subsidiary?