Permission to Appeal - July 2021
| Case Name | Justices | PTA | Reasons given |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maureemootoo and another (Appellants) v Aamil Portfolio Management and another (Respondents) (Mauritius) JCPC 2017/0084 |
Lord Briggs Lord Kitchin Lord Burrows |
Refused 15 July 2021 |
Permission to reinstate the appeal be refused. The Appellants have not identified any arguable grounds for setting aside the Judicial Committee's order |
| In the following cases, the advice which the Board proposes to give to Her Majesty is as indicated below | |||
| Grant (Respondent) v
Maduro (Appellant) (British Virgin Islands)
JCPC 2020/0063 |
Lord Reed Lord Leggatt Lord Hamblen |
Refused 21 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Goodman (Appellant) v
DMS Governance Ltd (Respondent) (Cayman Islands)
JCPC 2020/0066 | Lord Reed Lord Leggatt Lord Hamblen |
Refused 21 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |
| Bastian (Appellant) v
The Queen (Respondent) (Bahamas) JCPC 2018/0108 |
Lord Reed Lord Leggatt Lord Hamblen |
Granted 21 July 2021 |
N/A |
| Morrison (Appellant) v
The Queen (Respondent) (Jamaica) JCPC 2021/0041 |
Lord Reed Lord Leggatt Lord Hamblen |
Granted 21 July 2021 |
N/A |
| Mahoe Bay Company Ltd (Appellant) v
Sandals Royal Management Ltd (Respondent) (Jamaica)
JCPC 2020/0025 |
Lord Briggs Lord Kitchin Lord Burrows |
Refused 21 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Finzi (Appellant) v
Jamaican Redevelopment Foundation Inc. and others (Respondents) (Jamaica)
JCPC 2020/0016 |
Lord Briggs Lord Kitchin Lord Burrows |
Granted 21 July 2021 |
N/A |
| Bannister and another (Appellants) v
Hampton Ridge Condominium Association Ltd (Respondent) (Bahamas)
JCPC 2020/0004 |
Lord Briggs Lord Kitchin Lord Burrows |
Refused 21 July 2021 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |