Permission to Appeal - November 2022
| Case Name | Justices | PTA | Reasons given |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coomaravel Pyaneandee (Appellant) v
Paul Lam Shang Leen and 6 others (Respondents)
JCPC 2022/0040 Neutral Citation Number 2021 SCJ 167 |
Lord Briggs Lord Sales Lord Burrows |
Granted 15 November 2022 |
|
| In the following cases, the advice which the Board proposes to give His Majesty is as indicated below
|
|||
| Emmerson International Corporation and another (Appellants) v
Viktor Vekselberg and 2 others (Respondents) No 1 (British Virgin Islands)
JCPC 2022/0024 Neutral Citation Number BVIHCMAP 2021/0004 |
Lord Reed Lord Kitchin Lord Richards |
Refused 9 November 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Emmerson International Corporation and another (Appellants) v
Viktor Vekselberg (Respondent) No 2 (British Virgin Islands)
JCPC 2022/0025 Neutral Citation Number BVIHCMAP 2020/0011 |
Lord Reed Lord Kitchin Lord Richards |
Refused 9 November 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Peder Erik Prahl and another (Respondents) v
The Comptroller of Revenue (designated as Jersey competent authority) (Appellant) (Jersey)
JCPC 2022/0033 |
Lord Hodge Lord Leggatt Lady Rose |
Refused 9 November 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |
| Denard Davis (Appellant) v
The King (Respondent) (Bahamas)
JCPC 2022/0029 Neutral Citation Number SCCrApp No 42 of 2017 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Hamblen Lord Stephens |
Refused 9 November 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case. |
| Enos R Miller (Appellant) v
McKinney, Bancroft & Hughes and another (Respondents) (Bahamas)
JCPC 2022/0012 Neutral Citation Number ScCivApp No 27 of 2021 |
Lord Lloyd-Jones Lord Hamblen Lord Stephens |
Refused 9 November 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because there is no arguable point of law. The appeal is totally devoid of merit and there is no appeal as of right. |
| Molton Matthew (Appellant) v
The King (Respondent) (Grenada)
JCPC 2021/0054 |
Lord Briggs Lord Sales Lord Burrows |
Refused 9 November 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council has no jurisdiction. Article 14 of the Court of Appeal (Jersey) Law 1961 excludes this appeal and there is no arguable case to the contrary. |
| Robert Ivey (Appellant) v
Firearm Licensing Authority (Respondent) (Jamaica)
JCPC 2022/0030 Neutral Citation Number [2021] JMCA App 26 |
Lord Briggs Lord Sales Lord Burrows |
Refused 9 November 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Rudolph Strachan (Appellant) v
The King (Respondent) (Bahamas)
JCPC 2022/0037 |
Lord Briggs Lord Sales Lord Burrows |
Refused 9 November 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case. |
| Oleg Sheyko (Respondent) v
Consolidated Minerals Ltd (Appellant) (Jersey)
JCPC 2022/0035 Neutral Citation Number [2021] JRC 267 |
Lord Briggs Lord Sales Lord Burrows |
Refused 9 November 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council has no jurisdiction. Article 14 of the Court of Appeal (Jersey) Law 1961 excludes this appeal and there is no arguable case to the contrary. |
| Evelyn Julia Firth (Appellant) v
Scotiabank (Bahamas) Ltd (Respondent) (Bahamas)
JCPC 2022/0038 Neutral Citation Number ScCivApp No 88 of 2021 |
Lord Briggs Lord Sales Lord Burrows |
Refused 9 November 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because there is no appeal as of right. |