Permission to Appeal - May and June 2022
| Case Name | Justices | PTA | Reasons given |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pravesh Kumar Boulet (Appellant) v
Independent Committee Against Corruption and another (Respondents) (Mauritius)
JCPC 2021/0052 |
Lord Briggs Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Refused 25 May 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case. |
| Clifford Cursley Vivien (Appellant) v
The State of Mauritius (Respondent) (Mauritius)
JCPC 2021/0076 |
Lord Briggs Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Refused 25 May 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case. |
| In the following cases, the advice which the Board proposes to give to Her Majesty is as indicated below | |||
| Edward Gittins and another (Appellants) v
Montpelier (Trust and Corporate) Services Ltd (in Liquidation) (acting through Gordon Wilson as Receiver and Manager) (Respondent) (Isle of Man)
JCPC 2021/0067 Neutral Citation Number 2DS 2020/11 |
Lord Hodge Lord Hamblen Lady Rose |
Refused 8 June 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |
| Dion Bethel (Appellant) v
The Queen (Respondent) (Bahamas)
JCPC 2021/0102 |
Lord Briggs Lord Hamblen Lord Leggatt |
Refused 8 June 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case. There was no arguable error of law. |
| The Queen (Respondent) v
Durad Munroe (Appellant) (Bahamas)
JCPC 2018/0092 |
Lord Briggs Lord Hamblen Lord Leggatt |
Refused 8 June 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case. The new constitutional points are not arguable, were not raised below and are not appropriate to be determined by the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. |
| Robert Joseph Slack and another (Appellants) v
Sails Management Ltd (Respondent) (Gibraltar)
JCPC 2021/0108 Neutral Citation Number 2021/GCA/08 |
Lord Briggs Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Refused 8 June 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |
| Peter John Nygard (Appellant) v
Frederick Smith QC and 2 others (Respondents) (Bahamas)
JCPC 2021/0089 |
Lord Kitchin Lord Sales Lord Stephens |
Refused 8 June 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Nordbuild Ltd and another (Appellants) v
Attorney General of Jamaica and 8 others (Respondents) (Jamaica)
JCPC 2021/0079 Neutral Citation Number [2021] JMCA Civ 14 |
Lord Kitchin Lord Sales Lord Stephens |
Refused 8 June 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law. |