Skip to main content

Permission to Appeal

Permission to Appeal - May 2021


Permission to Appeal - May 2021
Case Name Justices PTA Reasons given
Webb and another (Appellants) v Henry (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago)
JCPC 2020/0059
Lord Briggs
Lady Arden
Lord Hamblen
Refused
14 May 2021
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance.
In the following cases, the advice which the Board proposes to give to Her Majesty is as indicated below
Hot Pancakes Ltd and another (Respondents) v Murphy and another (Appellants) (Bahamas)
JCPC 2021/0009
Lord Reed
Lord Kitchin
Lady Rose
Refused
26 May 2021
Permission to appeal should be refused because the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which the Board should consider at this time.
Her Britannic Majesty's Secretary of State for Defence of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland (Respondent) v Ibrahim and others (Appellants) (Cyprus)
JCPC 2018/0036
Lord Reed
Lord Kitchin
Lady Rose
Refused
26 May 2021
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance.
Matthias (Appellant) v Antigua Commercial Bank (Respondent) (Antigua and Barbuda)
JCPC 2020/0056
Lord Reed
Lord Kitchin
Lady Rose
Refused
26 May 2021
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law
Hapgood (Appellant) v Commissioner of Police and another (Respondents) (Anguilla)
JCPC 2020/0062
Lord Reed
Lord Kitchin
Lady Rose
Refused
26 May 2021
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which the Board should consider at this time.
Fang and others (Respondents) v Her Majesty's Attorney General (Appellant) (Jersey)
JCPC 2020/0012
Fang and others (Respondents) v Her Majesty's Attorney General (Appellant) (Jersey) No 2
JCPC 2020/0018
Lord Hodge
Lord Sales
Lady Burrows
Granted
26 May 2021
N/A
Smith and another (Appellants) v The Queen (Respondent) (Bahamas)
JCPC 2019/0045
Lord Briggs
Lady Arden
Lord Hamblen
Refused
26 May 2021
Permission to appeal should be refused because the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law and there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case.