Permission to Appeal - May 2021
| Case Name | Justices | PTA | Reasons given |
|---|---|---|---|
| Webb and another (Appellants) v Henry (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago) JCPC 2020/0059 |
Lord Briggs Lady Arden Lord Hamblen |
Refused 14 May 2021 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |
| In the following cases, the advice which the Board proposes to give to Her Majesty is as indicated below | |||
| Hot Pancakes Ltd and another (Respondents) v Murphy and another (Appellants) (Bahamas) JCPC 2021/0009 |
Lord Reed Lord Kitchin Lady Rose |
Refused 26 May 2021 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which the Board should consider at this time. |
| Her Britannic Majesty's Secretary of State for Defence of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland (Respondent) v
Ibrahim and others (Appellants) (Cyprus) JCPC 2018/0036 | Lord Reed Lord Kitchin Lady Rose |
Refused 26 May 2021 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |
| Matthias (Appellant) v
Antigua Commercial Bank (Respondent) (Antigua and Barbuda) JCPC 2020/0056 |
Lord Reed Lord Kitchin Lady Rose |
Refused 26 May 2021 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law |
| Hapgood (Appellant) v Commissioner of Police and another (Respondents) (Anguilla) JCPC 2020/0062 |
Lord Reed Lord Kitchin Lady Rose |
Refused 26 May 2021 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which the Board should consider at this time. |
| Fang and others (Respondents) v
Her Majesty's Attorney General (Appellant) (Jersey) JCPC 2020/0012 Fang and others (Respondents) v Her Majesty's Attorney General (Appellant) (Jersey) No 2 JCPC 2020/0018 |
Lord Hodge Lord Sales Lady Burrows |
Granted 26 May 2021 |
N/A |
| Smith and another (Appellants) v
The Queen (Respondent) (Bahamas) JCPC 2019/0045 |
Lord Briggs Lady Arden Lord Hamblen |
Refused 26 May 2021 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law and there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case. |