Skip to main content

Permission to Appeal

Permission to Appeal - February 2022

Permission to Appeal - February 2022
Case Name Justices PTA Reasons given
Mohamad Jiaved Ruhumatally (Appellant) v The State and another (Respondents) (Mauritius)
JCPC 2020/0027
Lord Hodge
Lord Briggs
Lord Leggatt
Granted
13 January 2022
 
Cherry Ann ajkumar (Appellant) v Southern Medical Clinic and 2 others (Respondents) (Trinidad & Tobago)
JCPC 2021/0020
Lord Briggs
Lord Kitchin
Lord Burrows
Refused
21 Janaury 2022
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise a point of law of general public importance. There is no appeal as of right and the application to adduce further evidence is dismissed.
Jesus Alexander Rodriguez Martinez (by his kin and next friend Luisa Del Valle Martinez Hernandez) and another (Appellants) v Chief Immigration Officer (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago)
JCPC 2021/0104
Civil Appeal No PO26 of 2021
Lord Kitchin
Lord Sales
Lord Stephens
Granted
1 February 2022
 
In the following cases, the advice which the Board proposes to give to Her Majesty is as indicated below
Reclaim Ltd (in Liquidation acting by its Joint Liquidators Edgar Lavarello and Colin Vaughan) (Respondent) v Law Abagados Patrimonial SL and another (Appellants) (Gibraltar)
JCPC 2021/0018
Lord Hodge
Lady Arden
Lady Rose
Refused
16 February 2022
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.
Urban St Brice (Appellant) v Attorney General of Saint Lucia (Respondent) (Saint Lucia) Cross-Appeal
JCPC 2021/0019
Lord Lloyd–Jones
Lord Sales
Lord Hamblen
Refused
16 February 2022
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law.
The Queen v Jason Laguea (Appellant) (Gibraltar)
JCPC 2021/0015
[2019] CACRI/005
Lord Lloyd–Jones
Lord Sales
Lord Hamblen
Refused
16 February 2022
Permission to appeal should be refused because there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case.
Harold Anthony Miller (Appellant) v Carlene Miller (Respondent) (Jamaica)
JCPC 2020/0002
Lord Briggs
Lord Kitchin
Lord Burrows
Refused
16 February 2022
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise a point of law of general public importance.
Claudia Franks–Cyrus and 3 others (Appellants) v Ruby Mae Fox and 2 others (Respondents) (Bahamas)
JCPC 2021/0008
Lord Briggs
Lord Kitchin
Lord Burrows
Refused
16 February 2022
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise a point of law of general public importance. This is not an appeal as of right and is in any event bound to fail.
Emmerson International Corporation (Respondent) v ABC Grandeservus Ltd (Appellant) (British Virgin Islands)
JCPC 2021/0014
Lord Briggs
Lord Kitchin
Lord Burrows
Refused
16 February 2022
Permission to appeal should be refused because the appeal does not raise a point of law of general public importance. This is purely a procedural appeal.