Permission to Appeal - February 2022
| Case Name | Justices | PTA | Reasons given |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mohamad Jiaved Ruhumatally (Appellant) v
The State and another (Respondents) (Mauritius)
JCPC 2020/0027 |
Lord Hodge Lord Briggs Lord Leggatt |
Granted 13 January 2022 |
|
| Cherry Ann ajkumar (Appellant) v
Southern Medical Clinic and 2 others (Respondents) (Trinidad & Tobago)
JCPC 2021/0020 |
Lord Briggs Lord Kitchin Lord Burrows |
Refused 21 Janaury 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise a point of law of general public importance. There is no appeal as of right and the application to adduce further evidence is dismissed. |
| Jesus Alexander Rodriguez Martinez (by his kin and next friend Luisa Del Valle Martinez Hernandez) and another (Appellants) v
Chief Immigration Officer (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago)
JCPC 2021/0104 Civil Appeal No PO26 of 2021 |
Lord Kitchin Lord Sales Lord Stephens |
Granted 1 February 2022 |
|
| In the following cases, the advice which the Board proposes to give to Her Majesty is as indicated below | |||
| Reclaim Ltd (in Liquidation acting by its Joint Liquidators Edgar Lavarello and Colin Vaughan) (Respondent) v
Law Abagados Patrimonial SL and another (Appellants) (Gibraltar)
JCPC 2021/0018 |
Lord Hodge Lady Arden Lady Rose |
Refused 16 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| Urban St Brice (Appellant) v
Attorney General of Saint Lucia (Respondent) (Saint Lucia) Cross-Appeal
JCPC 2021/0019 |
Lord Lloyd–Jones Lord Sales Lord Hamblen |
Refused 16 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. |
| The Queen v
Jason Laguea (Appellant) (Gibraltar)
JCPC 2021/0015 [2019] CACRI/005 |
Lord Lloyd–Jones Lord Sales Lord Hamblen |
Refused 16 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case. |
| Harold Anthony Miller (Appellant) v
Carlene Miller (Respondent) (Jamaica)
JCPC 2020/0002 |
Lord Briggs Lord Kitchin Lord Burrows |
Refused 16 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise a point of law of general public importance. |
| Claudia Franks–Cyrus and 3 others (Appellants) v
Ruby Mae Fox and 2 others (Respondents) (Bahamas)
JCPC 2021/0008 |
Lord Briggs Lord Kitchin Lord Burrows |
Refused 16 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise a point of law of general public importance. This is not an appeal as of right and is in any event bound to fail. |
| Emmerson International Corporation (Respondent) v
ABC Grandeservus Ltd (Appellant) (British Virgin Islands)
JCPC 2021/0014 |
Lord Briggs Lord Kitchin Lord Burrows |
Refused 16 February 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the appeal does not raise a point of law of general public importance. This is purely a procedural appeal. |