Permission to Appeal - April 2022
| Case Name | Justices | PTA | Reasons given |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chandra Silochan and another (Appellants) v
Rickie Cedeno (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago)
JCPC 2022/0002 Neutral Citation Number POSMG Appeal No P092 of 2019 |
Lord Kitchin Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Granted 1 April 2022 |
N/A |
| Marlon King (Appellant) v
The State of Trinidad and Tobago (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago)
JCPC 2021/0096 |
Lord Kitchin Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Refused 8 April 2022 |
Permission to appeal is refused because the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law; no issue of public importance arises; and there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case. |
| LC Regis Samy and others (Appellants) v
Winsley Dauguet and 3 others (Respondents) (Mauritius)
JCPC 2021/0017 |
Lord Hodge Lord Leggatt Lady Rose |
Refused 11 April 2022 |
Permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |
| In the following cases, the advice which the Board proposes to give to Her Majesty is as indicated below | |||
| St. Kitts Nevis Anguilla National Bank Ltd (Respondent) v Pinneys Hotel Development Ltd (Appellant) (St Christopher and Nevis)
JCPC 2021/0049 |
Lord Hodge Lord Leggatt Lady Rose |
Refused 13 April 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance. |
| Phoenix Group Foundation and another (Appellants) v Carl Jackson and 3 others (Respondents) (British Virgin Islands)
JCPC 2021/0039 |
Lord Briggs Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 13 April 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because there is no appeal as of right and the appeal does not raise a point of law of general public importance. |
| Julie McIntosh (Appellant) v
Family Guardian Insurance Company Ltd (Respondent) (Bahamas)
JCPC 2021/0040 |
Lord Briggs Lord Stephens Lady Rose |
Refused 13 April 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law. The appeal is wholly lacking merit. |
| Alistair McDonald (Appellant) v
The Queen (Respondent) (Jamaica)
JCPC 2021/0025 |
Lord Kitchin Lord Hamblen Lord Burrows |
Refused 13 April 2022 |
Permission to appeal should be refused because the appeal does not raise an arguable point of law; no issue of public importance arises; and there is no risk that a serious miscarriage of justice has occurred in this case. |