Visit UKSCJCPC/2022/0107
•
CRIME
The State of Trinidad and Tobago (Appellant) v Nawaz Ali (Respondent) (Trinidad and Tobago)
Case summary
Case ID
JCPC/2022/0107
Jurisdiction
Trinidad and Tobago
Parties
Appellant(s)
The State of Trinidad and Tobago
Respondent(s)
Nawaz Ali
Issue
Did the Court of Appeal err by upholding the trial judge’s decision to stay the indictment against the respondent?
Facts
In February 2009, Nawaz Ali (the respondent) was charged on an indictment containing three counts of corruption charges. In 2010, the respondent was acquitted by a jury on two counts but convicted by majority verdict on the third. He was sentenced to five years hard labour. He appealed his conviction to the Court of Appeal on the ground that the verdict against him on the third count was inconsistent with the not guilty verdicts on the two other counts on the indictment. The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in July 2010 and held that there could be no rational explanation for the jury’s verdicts. It ordered a retrial. At the re-trial, the respondent argued that the evidence upon which the Director of Public Prosecutions (the appellant) relied in the first trial on the two counts on which he had been acquitted was inadmissible in the re-trial. On 31 July 2018 the trial judge ruled that the evidence was inadmissible. She ordered that the indictment be stayed and the respondent discharged. The appellant appealed to the Court of Appeal, which held that the judge was wrong to exclude the evidence. However, the Court of Appeal also found that manner in which the indictment against the respondent was framed amounted to a miscarriage of justice. It held that the prosecution constituted an abuse of process of the court and that the respondent ought not to stand trial at all. The Court of Appeal therefore dismissed the appeal. The appellant now appeals to the Board.
Date of issue
6 December 2022
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Start date
21 May 2025
End date
21 May 2025
Watch hearings
21 May 2025 - Morning session
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Change log
Last updated 7 April 2025