Visit UKSCJCPC/2019/0088
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Philip Brelsford and 3 others (Appellants) v Providence Estate Ltd and another (Respondents) (Montserrat)
Case summary
Case ID
JCPC/2019/0088
Jurisdiction
Montserrat
Parties
Appellant(s)
Philip Brelsford and others
Respondent(s)
Providence Estate Ltd
Issue
This appeal concerns a number of real estate transactions between each Appellant and PEL in Montserrat. The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (the “Board”) is asked by the Appellants to set aside the orders of the Eastern Caribbean Supreme Court (Court of Appeal) (the “Appeal Court”) in relation to that Court’s determination:that each Appellant’s ownership of the relevant property (each a “Parcel”) was subject to an equity in favour of PEL and, relatedly, that each Appellant should execute transfer instruments in favour of PEL; and as to the application of certain provisions of the Montserrat Registered Land Act 2008 (the “Act”) to a series of transactions.
Facts
The facts of the present case are complex. Put briefly, between 2007 – 2008 each Appellant entered into a real estate transaction, in respect of a Parcel, with PEL. Mr Cassell, purportedly a director of PEL at the given time, represented the company. Mr Cassell had an interest in a law firm, Cassell & Lewis, which arranged for the transfer of the Parcels to the Appellants and their subsequent registration as proprietors of the relevant Parcels.In a separate litigation, Mr Rooney instituted proceedings against, amongst others, Mr Cassell in the United States. Mr Rooney alleged that Mr Cassell had not been a director of PEL at the relevant time. In a further related litigation in Montserrat, Mr Cassell was subsequently charged, and convicted, of defrauding PEL (such convictions were overturned on appeal to the Board in 2016 and a re–trial ordered on certain counts).The Appellants sought declarations that they were the absolute owners of the relevant Parcels and that they had been properly registered as owners of the relevant Parcels in accordance with the Act. PEL and Mr Rooney made certain counterclaims to the opposite effect. The High Court of Justice (the “High Court”) found against the Appellants. This decision was partially overturned by the Appeal Court.
Date of issue
1 August 2019
Judgment details
Judgment date
1 December 2022
Neutral citation
[2022] UKPC 46
Judgment links
Appeal
Justices
Hearing dates
Start date
18 July 2022
End date
18 July 2022
Watch hearings
18 July 2022 - Morning session
18 July 2022 - Afternoon session
All videos on this page are recorded and transmitted in line with the Court's terms of use. These can be found here. Please Note: Every effort is being made to provide a satisfactory streaming service of the Supreme Court judgments and hearings. However, these services may be subject to technical issues or delay, in which case we will attempt to resolve them as soon as possible.
Change log
Last updated 9 May 2024