Case details

C (Appellant) v C (Respondent) (Jersey)

Case ID: JCPC 2016/0084

Jurisdiction: The Court of Appeal of Jersey

Case summary


Whether it was open to Jersey courts to treat the appellant as a ‘parent’ for the purpose of orders for financial provision under the Children (Jersey) Law 2002


The appellant and the respondent met in Latvia in 2000 and were in a relationship until around the end of 2002. On 20 June 2003 the respondent had a child, A, and RZ was registered on the birth certificate as his father. The parties’ relationship resumed in November 2005. In June 2006 they applied successfully in Latvia for the rectification of the birth certificate to register the appellant as the father. The parties moved to Jersey in 2008. The relationship broke down and in July 2010 the respondent moved with A back to Latvia. She applied to the Jersey court for financial relief for A’s benefit. The appellant failed in his application to the Latvian courts for a further rectification of the birth certificate to remove his registration as A’s father. The Jersey courts held that the appellant should be treated as a parent based on his status as such under Latvian law, and that he was liable to make financial provision for A.








Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Hodge, Lord Kitchin, Lord Sales

Hearing start date

20 Feb 2019

Hearing finish date

20 Feb 2019

Watch hearing
20 Feb 2019 Morning session Afternoon session