Visit UKSCAll cases
991 Cases
JCPC/2024/0035
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Judgment given[2025] UKPC 53Case summary:On the correct interpretation of the policies, what contractual obligations did CS Life owe to the policyholder? Did the Respondents choose a discretionary mandate as their investment alternative? What measure should the Chief Justice have adopted as the measure of investment performance if CS Life had complied with its contractual duty of investment? What are the correct start and end dates for the assessment of damages for breach of the contractual duty of investment? Did CS Life owe fiduciary duties to the Respondents after the policies commenced?
Linked casesLast updated: 30 August 2026
JCPC/2024/0022
•
BUSINESS, PROPERTY, WILLS, AND TRUSTS
Judgment given[2025] UKPC 53Case summary:Is it a requirement of the tort of deceit that the claimant be aware of the making of the representations on which the claim is based? Does the claim for misrepresentation fail since it was brought after the expiry of the Georgian limitation period?
Linked casesLast updated: 30 August 2026
JCPC/2023/0077
•
TORT
Judgment given[2026] UKPC 5Case summary:Did the Court of Appeal err in upholding the trial judge’s determination that the Appellant had not established to the civil standard that his employer was liable in negligence and that there was no case to answer?
Last updated: 30 August 2026
JCPC/2024/0047
•
PUBLIC LAW AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Judgment given[2025] UKPC 39Case summary:Did the refusal by the Second Respondent to investigate the Appellant’s complaint of unfair dismissal by her employer, a charitable organisation, under the Labour Act (2021 Revision) breach her right to a fair hearing under section 7(1) of the Bill of Rights?
Last updated: 29 August 2026
JCPC/2025/0065/A
•
NEGLIGENCE
Judgment given[2026] UKPC 31Case summary:These appeals concern allegations of clinical negligence following Aeden’s birth. The issues raised for the JCPC’s consideration all concern findings of fact in relation to the cause of Aeden’s cerebral palsy. In Dr Abdulla’s appeal (JCPC/2025/0063), and in Surgi-Med Clinic Co Ltd’s cross-appeal (JCPC/2025/0065/A) (1) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to reverse the High Court’s finding of fact as to the timing of Dr Abdulla’s arrival? (2) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to find that causation was inevitably proved against Dr Abdulla, if it was proved that he arrived at 4am? In Aeden Balwah’s appeal (JCPC/2025/0065) (1) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to uphold the High Court’s finding that it had not been proved that Surgi-Med Clinic Co Ltd’s breach of duty caused Aeden Balwah’s cerebral palsy?
Linked casesLast updated: 28 August 2026
JCPC/2025/0065
•
NEGLIGENCE
Judgment given[2026] UKPC 31Case summary:These appeals concern allegations of clinical negligence following Aeden’s birth. The issues raised for the JCPC’s consideration all concern findings of fact in relation to the cause of Aeden’s cerebral palsy. In Dr Abdulla’s appeal (JCPC/2025/0063), and in Surgi-Med Clinic Co Ltd’s cross-appeal (JCPC/2025/0065/A) (1) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to reverse the High Court’s finding of fact as to the timing of Dr Abdulla’s arrival? (2) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to find that causation was inevitably proved against Dr Abdulla, if it was proved that he arrived at 4am? In Aeden Balwah’s appeal (JCPC/2025/0065) (1) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to uphold the High Court’s finding that it had not been proved that Surgi-Med Clinic Co Ltd’s breach of duty caused Aeden Balwah’s cerebral palsy?
Linked casesLast updated: 28 August 2026
JCPC/2025/0063
•
NEGLIGENCE
Judgment given[2026] UKPC 31Case summary:These appeals concern allegations of clinical negligence following Aeden’s birth. The issues raised for the JCPC’s consideration all concern findings of fact in relation to the cause of Aeden’s cerebral palsy. In Dr Abdulla’s appeal (JCPC/2025/0063), and in Surgi-Med Clinic Co Ltd’s cross-appeal (JCPC/2025/0065/A) (1) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to reverse the High Court’s finding of fact as to the timing of Dr Abdulla’s arrival? (2) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to find that causation was inevitably proved against Dr Abdulla, if it was proved that he arrived at 4am? In Aeden Balwah’s appeal (JCPC/2025/0065) (1) Was the Court of Appeal wrong to uphold the High Court’s finding that it had not been proved that Surgi-Med Clinic Co Ltd’s breach of duty caused Aeden Balwah’s cerebral palsy?
Linked casesLast updated: 28 August 2026
JCPC/2024/0021
•
EMPLOYMENT
Judgment given[2025] UKPC 42Case summary:Did the Court of Appeal err in finding that s.93 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act Ch. 88:08 applied to OSHA’s complaint against UWI
Last updated: 28 August 2026
JCPC/2023/0089
•
LANDLORD AND TENANT
Judgment given[2025] UKPC 36Case summary:Did the Supreme Court of Mauritius err in concluding that the appellant’s grounds of appeal were not on points of law? Did the Fair Rent Tribunal err in accepting the evidence of the respondent’s valuer’s evidence? Did the Fair Rent Tribunal err by taking into account evidence of rental values from 2017?
Last updated: 28 August 2026
JCPC/2026/0078
•
Appeal issuedCase summary:Last updated: 25 August 2026
JCPC/2026/0077
•
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Last updated: 25 August 2026
JCPC/2020/0055
•
COMMERCIAL
Judgment given[2023] UKPC 33Case summary:Is any part of a petition to wind up a company on just and equitable grounds susceptible to arbitration?
Last updated: 24 August 2026
JCPC/2026/0076
•
EMPLOYMENT
Appeal issuedCase summary:Last updated: 24 August 2026
JCPC/2026/0075
•
Appeal issuedCase summary:Last updated: 24 August 2026
JCPC/2026/0051
•
COURT PROCEDURE
Permission to Appeal application lodgedCase summary:Should the appellant have been granted permission to appeal against the judge’s refusal to admit his amended defence which was four months late?
Last updated: 20 August 2026
Sign up for case email alerts
Sign up to receive email alerts when a new case is added by the Court.