Hero image

Judicial Committee of the Privy Council

This is the final court of appeal for the UK overseas territories and Crown dependencies. It also serves those Commonwealth countries that have retained the appeal to His Majesty in Council or, in the case of republics, to the Judicial Committee.

The Court is closed for the remainder of the day


LISTINGS

Upcoming

  • UK Supreme Court

    Hearing

    3 November 2025

    Crozier or Veale and others (Respondents) v Scottish Power UK Plc (Appellant)

    Lord Reed,

    Lord Briggs,

    Lord Hamblen,

    Lord Leggatt,

    Lord Burrows

    Does the Damages (Scotland) Act 2011 entitle the relatives of a deceased person to claim damages following his death from asbestos-related mesothelioma, notwithstanding the prior settlement of a separate claim brought by the deceased for other asbestos-related injuries?


  • UK Supreme Court

    Hearing

    4 November 2025

    Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) v Kolicaj (Respondent)

    Lord Reed,

    Lord Lloyd-Jones,

    Lord Briggs,

    Lord Sales,

    Lord Stephens

    (1) Was it procedurally unfair for the Secretary of State for the Home Department to deprive Mr Kolicaj of his British citizenship without affording him an opportunity to make representations? (2) Did the Court of Appeal act in excess of jurisdiction by quashing the deprivation order made against Mr Kolicaj?


  • UK Supreme Court

    Hearing

    18 November 2025

    AXA Insurance UK PLC and another (Appellants) v Commissioners of Inland Revenue and another (Respondents)

    Lord Hodge,

    Lord Hamblen,

    Lord Leggatt,

    Lady Rose,

    Lord Richards

    Was the Court of Appeal correct to hold that (A) whether the claims are time-barred has not been finally determined in the Prudential test case, and should be determined in the present proceedings by applying the law as it stands now (“Limitation Issue”); (B) GREA is not entitled to a claim in restitution for payment of unlawful advance corporation tax utilised against lawful tax or repaid before the issue of its claim (“Set-off Issue”); and (C) by 1 April 2010, the Appellants had not pleaded a claim in restitution for the recovery of unlawful tax paid as a result of their inability to offset unused double taxation relief credit (“Pleading Issue”)?


  • UK Supreme Court

    Hearing

    20 November 2025

    R v BDN (Appellant)

    Lord Reed,

    Lord Sales,

    Lord Hamblen,

    Lord Burrows,

    Lord Richards

    (1) Do the terms of s.12(1A) of the Terrorism Act 2000 (“the TA”) represent a disproportionate interference with the appellants’ rights under article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”)? In the event that they do, is it possible to read down the terms of the offence to render them compatible? (2) What is the mental element in relation to the offence under s.12(1A)?

    Linked cases


  • UK Supreme Court

    Hearing

    10 December 2025

    Dairy UK Ltd (Respondent) v Oatly AB (Appellant)

    Lord Hodge,

    Lord Briggs,

    Lord Hamblen,

    Lord Burrows,

    Lord Stephens

    Was the Court of Appeal wrong to hold that Oatly AB could not validly register POST MILK GENERATION as a trade mark as this was prohibited under Article 78(2) and Part III of Annex VII of EU Regulation 1308/2013?



THINGS TO DO

Visit us
Things to do image

Take a tour of the Court

We offer a range of tours to suit individuals and groups, including in-person and virtual tours.

Exhibitions and events

Find out what's on, including our permanent exhibition about the history and work of the Court.

Our cafe

The cafe is open to the public Monday to Friday between 9am and 4pm.